Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Boston

A beautiful day in Boston, with positively dazzling weather: a felicitous balance of ocean humidity and cozy sunshine.

I've settled in with Carl and Mario, and met with Esther for dinner to chat about old times and updates on life. This week, I'm planning to (fingers crossed) get tickets to the Boston Symphony Orchestra, cook dinner with Carl, meet Erica and listen to some a cappella at Harvard, walk around downtown, go museum hopping to the Museum of Fine Arts and the Museum of Science, audit some classes, and meet other friends in the area!

Oh, and remind myself that school is starting and I ought to really be strapping down to work.


Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Almost Last Day of Class at SoCo

I have no excuse for not writing more updates on this blog except to say China firewalls blogspot, and I've been working as a TA for a course called "The Meaning of Life" taught by Stanford Dean of Religious Life Scotty McLennan.

First, for those who are interested in what has happened in China, our project website is currently under rennovation (as a result of our new ideas), but perhaps an overload of content is online at www.valuedchina.org.

In terms of Sophomore College (which is the umbrella program that houses the course I am teaching), six of the students who are in this seminar hail from Oxford, and along with the other eight Stanford students, there is plenty of enthusiastic discussion. I've relocated many of these perennial questions--why do I believe in God, what does it mean to be a Christian, what is the nature of man, what is consciousness--into the dusty bookshelf, only to have them vehemently torn out of their bookshelf place to be re-examined under harsh scrutiny. Having my beliefs called "fuc*ing illogical" (albeit in a semi-joking fashion) in re-exploring issues like the authority of the Bible (e.g. verses that advocate mass genocide, contradictions) or the validity of Jesus' resurrection or divinity has been an unexpected surprise. I am supposed to present my religious experiences to freshmen on Thursday, to in some ways, serve as an exemplar of how one can balance spirituality on this campus. I'm not even sure I can articulate (with this sometimes frustratingly-opaque tool of communication called language) what I mean by Christianity and how to draw those lines.

From Blog
I've attached a photograph of (some) of these wonderful individuals/souls (oh fine--let's be really strict and just say entities) here. All philosophy and argumentation aside, I think the relationships amongst the group this year reside in a strange state of being close in spite of knowing the intellectual chasms are in many ways irreconcilable. On the other hand, I sense the cracks and cliques that form amongst different personalities and ways of thinking amongst people in the group. Again, I am reminded that what we believe has very real ramifications for who we interact with and how.

On the other hand, the fact that we can reside peacefully within the same dorm for two weeks, go on wacky field trips to Salinas, Monterey, San Francisco... camp up at a site overlooking a racetrack, go swimming with each other, play chess, eat ice cream, and enjoy each other's company... there's encouragement within the harmony possible even amidst such difference. You'll never catch me saying that we are all the same ultimately, however. If anything, the fact that we vigilantly guard our personal beliefs and harshly rebuke those who even dare to challenge assumptions of say, a rational universe, intrinsically good people, the existence/non-existence of God, selflessness as a good thing, etc. leads me to conclude that there can be little true coherence. Ah. But I am dearly biased.

Another lesson in community building: make sure to have a rallying cause to which everyone can subscribe.

On an aside, freshman move-in was today... I'm quite distraught at my own distance from that magical time.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Last Day of the NSLC

Walking down empty corridors that once used to be filled with lively youth chatting, playing guitar, throwing plush balls, and watching YouTube videos in turn leaves me with a sense of emptiness. Listening to the same songs that I locked in repeat as I tried to finish the letters I wrote for the last batch of students leaves a bittersweet aftertaste in my heart. After working with countless students in camps, in classrooms, and in conferences, I can never escape the dull grip of loneliness mixed with that odd sense of void. Working intensively with people and committing time and life to their growth, then suddenly having them all disappear has that effect, I suppose.

It's time to pack up here after almost 45 days worth of intense learning on my own part. As when I left Dandelion, when I left Nanjing, when I left Aimin, when I left HSSC, when I left Zhunan, when I left my Japanese medical students at Stanford... I am at a loss. Tonight was also the last hurrah for us TAs, most of whom are going to be leaving tomorrow. We all went off to watch a baseball game (the Pirates vs. the Giants), cracking jokes and finally reverting to our quirky college selves.

In a sense, my experiences here have been quite miniscule. Furthermore, the impact and "prestige" associated with working with youth is hardly comparable to those working, say, in Washington DC, starting their own nonprofits, or studying to become the world's future doctors/lawyers/researchers/etc. Yet, to see the speedy growth of students over the course of ten days and to realize their potential for further growth inspires me to continue working in this field. Which brings me back to the concept of "impact."

I have been meaning to respond to Tony's wonderful response/challenge to my little musing on "impact."
Perhaps we shouldn't be giving up on the pursuit of impact - what choice do we have but to make the decisions we think will impact the world in the most positive way? - but to recognize that ultimately, our individual efforts are subject to incredible variance and unpredictability. Another way to frame the issue is asking ourselves whether it would be better for humanity in the aggregate would be better off if everyone chose to maximize impact. If not, then we should ask ourselves what choice would be better.
In addition to fully agreeing with Tony, I think for me, teaching has been a source of great positive impact, and while I recognize the variance, unpredictability, and limited nature of working on individual basis with people, I am encouraged by the concrete and (in my mind) positive changes in people's attitudes and thinking. Oh, but now to think about how teaching fits in with my interests in medicine/management/etc.

Oh, more on this later... I'm working off of about 2 and a half hours of elapsed sleep over the past two days!

Friday, July 17, 2009

Walking Down College Avenue, Berkeley

Small things in life are always surprisingly and astonishingly beautiful.

As I walked up College Avenue in Berkeley back to Unit One (where I'm living), I was encouraged by the simplicity of life: an African American teenager of perhaps fourteen on a stunt bike cheering on a younger white kid who was trying to do some tricks on his bike. A jogger in loose fitting cotton pants stopping at the light and breathing heavily. A student (I assume from Berkeley) dressed in a crimson shirt (go Stanford!) standing by another light asking for donations for the children's hospital (I gave him a dollar). A young Asian mother walking with her (I assume) son down the street chatting about which restaurant they will visit this evening. A cafe with bags of coffee beans as pillows, and college-aged students studiously pounding away at their keyboards. A homeless man pulling a cart full of little scraps of luggage, newspaper, and bottles. A middle-aged man strolling along only to stop momentarily by the field to comment on the "good swing" of the teenagers playing. A seemingly mismatched couple--a surprisingly wide white woman with a surprisingly skinny Hispanic man--holding hands, smiling sweetly, and sauntering/lumbering (honestly no other word!) down the street.

Even within a ten minute walk down a street, all these little tidbits about human beings living their life reminds me that my own life is a tiny fiber in a very big tapestry of life. And that's both a call to action as well as a call of encouragement.

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Urban Education in the USA and Migrant Education in China

**Disclaimer #1: LONG post!**
**Disclaimer #2: All unclarity is my fault and I take responsibility--this is definitely unpolished**

During Independence Day, a topic relating to educational adequacy seems particularly germane. For what kind of independence does a country truly have when such an egregious number of students fail to receive an acceptable standard of education, much less equitable standard? According to the National Bureau for Educational Statistics, in 2005, national drop-out rate was 9%, but 22.5% of Latino/as dropped out of high school, compared to 2.9% for Asians 6 % for Caucasians, and 10.4 % for African Americans (by self-identified race... which , yes, is a social construct but a reality nonetheless). For if we--and here I speak as an American citizen, halfbreed that I am--merely celebrate independence from colonialization, I might argue that we have left parts of this country in intellectual slavery.

I argue that the Chinese story of providing education for migrants sharply parallels the American story of providing education to minorities--with the key difference that America is split along racial lines and China is split primarily along urban/rural lines. With less than one month remaining to my trip to Beijing, this theoretical claim has successively gained volume in my mind. I then propose that we shift our frame of reference when viewing educational inequities for migrants in light of the historical progress (or lack thereof) that the American urban education system has made.

By system, I refer to the holistic ecological framework of students, parents, teachers, communities, administrators, policies, cultural backdrop, and curricula encompassed by the word "school system." Furthermore, by "system," I acknowledge individual variations and focus primarily upon the patterns and trends rather than individual cases. If you're interested in my citations, feel free to send me an email... I'm too lazy to make this anything formal.

David Tyack, an educational historian, suggests that a theme dominating the history of American urban education is the "One Best System," as per his eponymous work. Administrators locked onto the idea of accountability and testing during a period of rapid industrialization by borrowing those ideas from factories. They proceeded to merge small village all-grades-sit-together schoolhouses to rationalized (in the Weberian sense of bureaucratization and specialization) schools complete with administrators and specialized teachers. Pluralism began to grow out of the conflict between religious traditions (esp. Judaism and Christianity), but never took root in other areas (esp. race). Schools underwent a period of rapid centralization, with political conflicts among local governments and unions to garner control for the schools. Most significantly, financing models for schools were turned to property taxes: smack dab at a time when GI Joes were returning from World War 2 and looking for homes. Any surprise that the white men were given homes that had higher property value, and black men living in white neighborhoods scared others from buying and lowered the property value?

As a backlash, phenomena like charter schools and private schools today challenge this high level of centralization (although bills like No Child Left Behind continue to push toward central levels of testing and control). Varying grants are given to urban education today, and remedial programs/vocational education is gaining traction for students unable to remain in the system.

Even so, minorities today face huge challenges. The first is segregation: even in the wake of Brown v. Board of Education, schools today are far more segregated than ever before. Schools with names commemorating our fiercist civil rights leaders are among the most segregated--Martin Luther King parks and schools are renowned for their near 100% black and Latino student population. In addition to living in segregated communities with high poverty rates, some minority students face language barriers, discriminated for speaking in certain manners or low proficiency (i.e. ebonics and ESL learners). They lack proper cultural capital--ways of speaking, acting, or otherwise communicating--that jive with the dominant class of society.

Turning to China, one is suprised to note contemporary educational history follows similarly. Without the racial boundaries, a new urban/rural dichotomy was codified in law. Not unlike the emancipation movement, when rural residents were legally "given" their rights, they continued to shoulder the burden of over thirty years of prejudice and underdevelopment. Migrants moving to cities are discriminated for their rural accents and lack of "cultural capital."

In a hilarious twist, even though legally (parallel to Brown v Board of Ed) they are allowed to attend public schools, they are now mostly shunted to private or semi-private (a parallel to charter) schools that are almost 100% migrants as a result of geographic segregation and low income. Geographic segregation and low income are caused by two main elements: part of the issue is the lack of high level, white collars jobs for migrants (ring any bells?), and another side of the issue is migrants want to be somewhere where they feel accepted and in a community that shares similar needs (ring any bells?). The migrant schools have lower budgets (any surprise?) and hire lower quality teachers and have far lower quality facilities. In America, the higher class often attends private schools while minorities attend public schools in urban areas--ergo the irony.

Not surprisingly, schools are linked with their surrounding communities and properties. In Beijing, all migrant schools and migrants are localized outside of the 4th to 5th ring (a series of highways that circle the city). In another ironic twist, the impoverished localize in the suburbs while the affluent live in the urban city centre. But nonetheless, they embody the segregation and paucity of resources seen in the United States. Add to this a higher level of crime in these regions, high level of drop outs, family instability, and we really have a close parallel to the low-income communities of urban America.

Rationalization has worked its way through China as well. Mergers have consolidated schools in different villages, with the result that several families either cannot afford or have trouble bringing their children to the centralized school. In some cases, this fuels their desire to bring their children with them into the cities when they migrate. The rapid rationalization and bureaucratization of schools (remember that during the Mao period tests were abandoned and only during the industiralization of recent years have they returned--also borrowed from factories and industirial institutions!) has also led to close monitoring of these migrants for their academic performance, with HIGH stakes tests (the zhongkao and gaokao) that determine their future path.

Oh, this list could continue on and on... I feel like it's a paper in and of itself! But the upshot is that the two systems are closely aligned. As my professor Prudence Carter presented the following list of elements, I couldn't help but notice how the two systems share several of them:
Industrialization, Modernization, Immigration, Migration, Discrimination,
Segregation, Incorporation, Assimilation,Community Disorganization, Poverty Concentration, Social Isolation, Bureaucratization, Specialization, Politicization

Given these similarities, I propose that policymakers in China carefully weigh their choices, lest the trajectory of migrant education follows urban education (and I would LOVE to hear a compelling arguement that America's compulsory educational system is "successful," insofar it achieves goals it sets for itself).

For example, developing a strong vocational track may not sound good for most Chinese citizens, but vocational education has long been proven to be a "sink" trains and equips those who are unable to be adequately trained in the usual track. Not a perfect solution, but one that buys time and ensures the next generation of migrants can have a better chance (the son of a plumber probably has more money to go to school than the son of a menial factory worker).

Furthermore, I propose a particular emphasis on the provision of good terms for teachers in migrant schools. The lack of provision for good teachers in urban education has proven disasterous. Whether its a tenure system that awards longstaying but poor teachers, or low salary, or little flexibility, few teachers willingly decide to dedicate their entire career to urban education. While all levels of the system need to be changed, a targeted intervention on the part of teachers can allow for experimentation of best practices in curricula (here is yet again another side effect of "one best system centralization:" not all student learn the same way!).

To use a war analogy, if we were fighting in a war, the first thing to do is ensure the first line of defense is well equipped, healthy, and well-trained. To focus on building better forts (schools/facilities) or developing better technology (curricula/technology) is important, but not when migrant teachers have a turnover of 95% over 2 years (95% of teachers leave the school after at most 2 years). It's like having an army of such exceedingly low morale that nearly all your soldiers leave after at most two years of service.

These two provisions are clearly lacking in detail and have little chance of success without cash, political clout, and strong adminstration. All things are linked, as they say. But I do think they provide two focal points to challenge the status quo, and place the problem of migrant education in good focus.

Oh... and today will be the last day that I have the leisure and time to write out my thoughts, hopefully as a repository for future reference!

Now back to writing actual papers rather than flimsy blog posts >.<

Thursday, July 2, 2009

Disjointed Ideas

Here is a bag of disjointed ideas that need organizing in the future.

**DISCLAIMER: I'm serious when I say they are disjointed. Read at your own risk.**

(a) After heading down to Resolved, I have been increasingly disturbed by the political associations to religion (conservative Christian versus liberal atheist). And also the increasing "moralization" of liberal as being wayward.

One of the most memorable and disturbing experiences: John MacArthur's vituperative attack on global warming ("there is no evidence to show that humans are warming the planet!"), environmentalism ("God *cursed* this planet!"), evolution ("the first test of Christian obedience to scripture is Genesis 1, and evolution simply cannot fit in"), and feminism/homosexuality ("feminine men and homosexuals must see their sinfulness") frightens me. For me, it isn't primarily the content that continues to haunt me , but rather to witness a man of such supposed scholarly caliber to rain such judgment on these issues. Okay, content also scares me: for someone to in the same one hour lecture first deny the authority of science over scripture (I can deal with this point) but THEN try to provide scientific (in the general sense of empiricism and inductive reasoning) evidence against global warming, homosexuality, evolution, and environmentalism... and be applauded as if he's successfuly done that makes me shiver.

His response, I must consider, would be to say that if Scripture condemns something, Christians are free to condemn it as well with the authority of scripture. Even given that point, one of the wedge issues in my head that has found little resolution is homosexuality.

Getting a chance to correspond with Zaid, one of the most intelligent and thoughtful Muslims friends I have, has helped think about LGBT in context. EVEN if assume Islam and Christianity agree that all relationships outside of the *religious* conception of marraige (=man+woman) are sinful, what is the loving and kind response?

(b) Segue into Don Miller's Blue Like Jazz: I just finished reading it tonight. His final chapters on love were intriguing responses to my previous question. First, he presents the dilemma: free-love hippies living in the forest who are non-Christian come off as more accepting and loving than Christians--who ought to be absolutely accepting and loving having been given that gift from God. He realizes that Christians use economic metaphors to describe love (investing in a relationship) and somewhat haphazardly ties things together to say that the dilemma is solved.

Okay. But what does it mean to be fully accepting of ourselves (humanity, you, and me--straight, female, male, homosexual, liberal, democrat, conservative, republican alike)? My proclivity is to say "leave the judging to God, MacArthur!" and deal with what I can: accepting and loving people for who they are. But another side of my conscience pricks me: isn't that compromising? If I are fully convinced (and I'm definitely not at this point) that LGBT is sinful, then after I have demonstrated my love and care, part of my duty is to tell people. How else will they hear that LGBT lifestyle is sinful? And what good, loving father ever let his son continue down a path that would get his son hurt?

(c) And this brings me to a wonderful screenplay by Robert Bolt: A Man for All Seasons. Reading A Man of All Seasons, the character Thomas More takes comfort in the "forested realms" of society and law (they are on "firm [i.e. understandable] ground") rather than navigating the unpredictable moral waters of the transcendent.

Of course, that is not to say that he values the law higher than the morals of God. As a Catholic in a country entering the throes of Reformation because of a King who wants to divorce his infertile wife for another (who, incidentally, was supposed to be his brother's wife), Thomas More is eventually beheaded for standing to his belief that the Pope is the authority of God and the divorce is unlawful by the eyes of God. The screenplay makes it clear that he stands firm because he does not want to lose "himself," his integrity.

"It is not important that I believe, it is important that I believe!"

Actually, his ability to stay within the forested realms of human law refers to his belief that on earth these laws keep society ordered and safe rather than maintain morality. Until he is betrayed by his friend Rich, he does fanciful legal acrobatics by playing through loopholes in the law and keeps his head even while refusing to endorse the King. He refuses to sign an oath saying the King's new marraige is legal, but nothing in the law can convict him.

His dilemma is piercingly reiminescent of Prop 8. Can Christians endorse Prop 8 without sacrificing integrity and God's morality? Are laws inherently moral? Or do they function to maintain the order and proper functioning of society?

(d) Reading updates from my friends--all across the world--reminds me of how truly limited our experiences are. Whether in Honduras, Bangkok, XinJiang, Kenya, Beijing, Washington DC, or Britain, our senses cannot possibly comprehend such diversity. And to think: the Earth is but a tiny terrestrial ball orbiting one tiny sun in a grand universe.

One particular discussion that has continued to bounce back and forth (especially with PSLPers) is the importance of impact (or the lack thereof). How important should making a big impact in this world be for me in defining my goals and directions? Applying for grants and fellowships highlights this dilemma--as all of them are seeking applicants who attempt to maximize their impact. But WAIT: what is impact? And to whom?

Just because I've done a lot or expanded a program quickly means nothing in terms of impact. The complex threads of cause and effect dictate that your little act of selflessness today at the bookstore may have just saved the universe without your knowing. And your feeding thousands of homeless today may have accidentally done something heinous. Looking across time, looking across geography, looking through various metrics--impact becomes accursedly ethereal and intangible. My conclusion is to provide due weight to what fulfills you: what impacts YOU (of course, I will argue that playing video games all day is clearly less impactful than working at a shelter).

(e) And in pursuit of impact, I've realized there are other parts of this ship sailing through uncertain waters that are in need of attention. I am no man for all seasons, for at this season of my life, the most daunting fear is no longer to be known and to have found achievement. Rather, my fear is the groaning of this ship's planks soaked in brine, lost from the shore and utterly alone. The hunger and thirst of a crew surrounded by water, but unable to drink; to serve amidst thousands of people and have connection to nobody.

Maybe--and I smile sheepishly--it was watching Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog that stuck a chord of discomfort at knowing how quickly time passes and how uncertain everything can be. And just how disconnected.

I'm making no sense.

Sense is overrated.

But I shouldn't judge.

I need to stop. Now. XD.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Shoutout to Parents :)

I've not been able to update lately, given the hectic schedule (I've not slept for about 38 hours straight now). But I just sent the last students on the shuttle to SFO, and now I've got a few minutes to spare before lunch.

The all-too-familiar feeling of leaving a group of people that I've nurtured, invested, committed, and worked with for an extended period of time strikes again. The longer I work in this field, the more I'm understanding the nuances of that emotion, and how it affects my work (and how to best channel this energy to facilitating growth in my students/mentees).

But I want to focus on my thanks to all the parents in this world, who must feel this sense of loss most tangibly when their children leave for their own lives. Just in the course of a few days, I've developed an intuitive sense for each and every individual in my group. How much more so a parent who is willing to invest literally hundreds of thousands of hours on one person. I can't imagine how much more accenutated this feeling must be. My taste of empty nest syndrome isn't altogether a sweet one, and I can't imagine the thought of letting a son or daughter go.

And, as always, continuing my work in the field of education reminds me all the more to be thankful for my own mentors and guides: my parents, brother, friends, teachers, and most signficantly, God.

More on the conference as I have a day or two to recuperate!

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Developing Community Is a Skill

I've not posted on this blog in ages, it seems. But again, I'm embarking on yet another journey of life, having closed the chapter before.

The school year has ended, and I just received my grades for Spring quarter. I've just returned from a fantastic conference down in Palm Springs, which has helped me refocus my priorities and re-center my life in my faith, and I'm currently "back-in-the-real-world" at Berkeley learning about how to mentor and teach students.

One particular point of learning I want to share is how building communities takes practice and skill--along with a good dose of passion and love for those around you. Communities are nebulous things, but they can still be created, and I'm both humbled and impressed at the abilities of the people at Resolved, as well as the staff at NSLC here. They have all demonstrated their prowess in building community.

The nature and definition of communities is a whole topic in and of itself, and how to build community is all but a multi-chapter book, but here are some musings:

1. Community Starts with a Shared Commitment
Sounds simple, but the weakest communities that I have been a part of have failed at this point. Either the leader has imposed a set of commitments to follow, no shared commitments have been delineated, or an agreement without any accountability has been created. At the very least, a set of standards need to be clearly stated and consistently followed--Rick begins the whole conference with worship, prayer, and then carefully calls attention to the theme of the conference. The NSLC staff--on the first night--sit down and share their expectations and norms to follow.

Most importantly, it takes skills: our discussion leader for NSLC clearly prepared for this discussion, having speakers with music to fill the gaps when we were thinking, having poster paper taped to the walls, having clear prompts, skittles for icebreakers, etc. Her questions were clearly refined and rehearsed, and her ability to focus discussion required trained listening.

2. Small Stuff REALLY Matters:
*Really* fancy wristbands that say "Resolved" that glow in the dark? Five Egyptian cotton polo shirts with NSLC written on them? Book giveaways, fancy binders with logos printed? Having a dress code that requires business formal and wearing a nametag at *all* times? These things seem so tangential to the actual mission, and take a huge amount of money and time to prepare (giving books to 4000 people is not cheap or easy). However, these things create unity and a rather visible sense of community--and accountability. When the nebulous overarching goals of a community are intangible, these will continue to bind people together. More importantly, if there is hierarchy of order, having different colored shirts is a big plus :).

3. Make Things Fun and Personal:
The more personal, the more immediate, and the more fun/engaging--the stronger the community. Break groups up, give options, let people exercise agency, play games to introduce concepts--most of all, give people space to express their ideas. Even if those ideas aren't adopted, make space!

4. Administration Is Key:
Hilarious to say this, but NSLC and Resolved both succeeded because they had a huge team of people working behind the scenes to do... office work. Boring, bureaucratic, "dumb" work. Sending emails, walkie-talkies, phone numbers, fax machines, copying, buying supplies, dealing with budgets. When building larger communities, this kind of work is a full-time job for a dedicated staff. But in any community, this kind of administrative work forms a backbone to anything else that happens--if a Bible Study decides to send out emails, somebody needs to be on it. If an a cappella group decides to share prayer requests, somebody needs to be on it. Community-building takes concerted work and organization.


In closing, I think ultimately a community is built on "fuzzier stuff"--caring for another, mutual respect, etc--but solid skills are needed to bring them to fruition. I wonder how these ideas can be brought back to, say, RUF... things like T-shirts and advertisements might actually go a long way, and having interns spend more time dealing with administrative "stuff" (e.g. sending emails when needed), or breaking into smaller, randomized discussion groups *during* large group to improve the personal and fun aspect of things (rather than just getting a sermon).

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Sitting at the CoHo

Listening to jazz at the CoHo, typing away at my computer to the smell of coffee and watching as a bunch of people play a game of chess.

Life is good.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Within

Here's a poem I discovered sitting in my notebook that I wrote a few years ago. It's funny to compare my poetry from high school to what I scribble in my journal these days. I personally like it... even if it's not very polished. but I'm biased for my past self :).

Also... I just got back from a jazz concert (seriously awesome, right?)... and it's been raining recently. So it works for me!

It glides down in rivulets,
middle C to E
Plip plop, pitter patter
a percussion band, rather

Neon signs and traffic lights
shimmering in replicating beads
Mellifluous hues blooming through
clouded, diffused stew?

Wait.
Is that humanity, seen through lucid haze?

Tender taps on frigid flesh.
Another stoic face,
another vacant stare.
All entangled
in the mind's fecund lair.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Great Lectures and Conferences - BACKPOST

Deconstructing ideas hardly sounds like a productive endeavor, but I would argue that especially in a college environment it is critical. Weber imagines human beings to be suspended in a web of meaning as if a spider, except some of the meanings are not spun by ourselves. Colleges are a peculiar locus of meaning-making, because ideas are typically considered and shared in much higher frequency (with notable exceptions). Starting from the assumption that a personally fulfilling--and mind you, not necessarily successful, for that is a socially defined state of achievement--life has consistency as one of its criteria, it seems that deconstructing some of the webs that are incongruous with our actual desired way of living is a productive endeavor.

Recently, This Dust of Words was screened on campus. It's a poetically filmed documentary of Elizabeth Wiltsee, which follows the life of a Stanford graduate who gradually succumbs to what is assumed to be mental illness as she pursues a life she believes is most fulfilling. Her intellect is profound, having mastered Greek at a young age and learned classical Chinese along her way. After the screening, I randomly met my friend Belinda as she discussed the poignancy of Liz's life. She later sent me this article. I'm not sure I entirely agree with this article, but its harrowing vision of those who "have many achievements but little experience, great success but no vision" is one that leads me to reflect on my Stanford undergraduate career. The screening blends mercilessly with the article, offering a vision of a vulnerable, free-spirited, and "unsuccessful" life that contrasts almost scathingly with brilliance, potential, and competence.

When I attended the Stanford Service Summit over the weekend, I was surprised by the ideologically charged atmosphere in the Social Entrepreneurship forum. It was so reminiscent of the AlwaysOn conference that I attended last summer. So many of the students had their own projects, and were shaking hands and smiling and buzzing around to no end, trying to garner attention and support for their projects. Tolnay's veritable injunction to "be a starter and entrepreneur" rather than a follower was a startling one, but to my fascination, devoured by a good number of those around me. Stanford ought to be a university of leaders, not followers. A quote that sticks in my mind: "if you want something done, find a busy person to do it."

Taking two flights of stairs up to the Education themed forum, I was startled by the contrast, the suggestion that too many students were eager to achieve--to find reputation in "doing" things first.

On the other hand, these voices are probably not the majority at Stanford. Two days later, I met with a professor who tried to convince me to return to pre-med. Teaching is not challenging enough, in fact, it was "fu*king boring" (verbatim, but somewhat in jest). Doctors could do more in life and do more for society (I quote). You HumBio people should be able to guess who :).

In introducing ourselves in class, I was asked what I do right after my name was introduced. At a TFA recruiting meeting, I was asked to introduce what I did even before my name was introduced (or I was asked to introduce my name). When I say I took two quarters to be in China, I'm fascinated by the more sudden and snappy question that inevitably arises: "what were you doing?" I once joked that I needed to spend time at home reflecting on my life and just spending time with family. Why is it that I saw *relief* in my friend's face?

Why is it that I can feel so uncomfortable when I'm not "doing" anything. Why is it that my contentment is contingent upon my abilities; that my name is followed inevitably by what I do? Why is it that I tend toward accosting others with the question "what are you doing/doing next/up to?" rather than my favorite "how are you?"

Now... I see myself as an activist (total sidenote--I'm so frustrated by the fact that the "activist mailing list" at Stanford seems only to allow for raging democrats who must fully support queer rights... why is there a hegemony on who is an activist? The so called bigot can be an activist just as well). Armchair philosophy never did any good. But perhaps it's time to deconstruct the idea of being productive. Our "doing" oriented lives must be grounded in some greater meaning. Doing is a means, not an end.

To return to my preface... I wonder if I am living consistently. Do I actually like to be engaged in doing things all the time? Or perhaps I just don't want to stare into what Augustine deemed "homo abisus" and Nietzsche termed the "abyss." So we toil away...

My spring quarter is an experiment in forcing myself to remain at fewer than 50 hours of work per week. Let's see how things unfold.

Thursday, April 2, 2009

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time

I just finished this novel by Mark Haddon as a part of my class on novels of illness, and it's one of the most fascinating accounts of Asperger's Syndrome that I've ever read.

While the link provides a better summary, the story is essentialized as follows (WARNING: SPOILER!):
Chris, a young male student with Asperger's, wakes up one night to see the neighbor's dog speared with a gardening fork. He hugs it and is caught by the owner, Ms. Spears. He gets in trouble when he punches the officer who touches him (he can't stand being touched). His father comes to the rescue. The story progresses as you gain insight into his school life, his ethics, his way of reasoning. More importantly, you enter his mind. He is deceived by his father, who tells him that his mother died of a heart attack (but this is a coping mechanism on his part, as she ran away with Ms. Spears' original husband). Chris's father is then discovered to be the one who killed the dog. Chris, who now thinks his father will kill him, runs away to his mother's apartment (she lives with Mr. Spears). The story ends on an optimistic note from his perspective, but as a reader, you can see how his family is still in shambles.

I think back to my student Roger (pseudonym), a brilliant fellow with a penchant for difficult math and physics problems, rocking back and forth in an eerie way, and looking right through your head when talking to you. I think back to Adam Pugh, a great friend of mine who only mildly suggested Asperger's (but Adam, you did tell me once that you suspected you had the syndrome). He was perhaps the most intelligent student here on campus I've ever met.

The novel is heart-wrenching, but even more fascinating in that its narrator, a savant who soaks in every detail of his surroundings, cannot understand emotions very well. Rather, the world is literal and has no space for lies: metaphors, exaggerations, figures of speech. Mathematics and science are the tools for understanding a positivist world, logically broken into pieces. As such, the "human" characters serve as a foil to Christopher's seeming inhumanity.

To be entirely honest, I envy Chris. While everything in his family goes haywire, he cannot comprehend some of the greater difficulties that his father and mother face. I sometimes feel pity for his father--the kind of searing pain that arises from perceived betrayal, then the kind of coping mechanisms that lead to his irrationality, but his timeless but sometimes useless love for his son... exhibited in his eternal patience but unfortunate incompetence... gah. You'll have to read the book to understand exactly what I mean, unfortunately. I think Haddon's portrayal of humanity as I understand it is fantastic: the brokenness, inability to commit, transience, complexity... but of course also our honor, integrity, love, and endurance. It's never simple.

Sure, Asperger's Syndrome is a mild form of autism... but it elicits such a complicated mixture of normative evaluations. Our college cultural emphasis on competence finds its pinnacle in the amazing skills of Chris's savant abilities... and yet he suffers from what we imagine to be meaninglessly easy issues. His dream is to be in a submersible in the bottom of the ocean... or better yet, to have a virus wipe out all other humans in the world. At one point, at his most extreme when placed under huge amounts of stress, he wants to just destroy everything with his Swiss pocket knife.

And yet. Sometimes I long for that feeling myself--to have people just disappear... because they make this world so damn complicated. Or damn painful. We really screw each other up sometimes (Can we look at some of those lovely genocides... and not to mention closer to home, all the backstabbing that goes on). I often wish the world were, as Chris wants it to be, completely logical, precise, and rational. Is that pathological?

Key question: why do psychiatrists get to decide who is ill and who isn't?

I think *I'm* sick as can be... and Chris is the healthy one. Human emotions can be so unbelievably ill-adaptive. We do, as Chris says, stupid things that make no logical sense. Haddon illustrates this most poignantly with the broken marriage of Chris's parents... Maybe it's just having read so many books and seen so many things that bash marriage and courtship, my view of relationships is becoming *very* bleak. If only we had a bit more rationality and fewer emotional complexities, wouldn't this world be a much easier place to live in?

Here is a question that leaves me deeply ambivalent, especially as a novice educator and qualitative researcher. There are things that Chris will have huge difficulties experiencing or enjoying that I find essentially human: love and faith being two of them. And one wonders... in our complete rationality, maybe we would all just kill each other. And indeed... it's often the irrationality of love that makes relationships work (sometimes... um, given the recent statistics, maybe occasionally is a better way to put it). Maybe an easier world isn't what we want... but tell that to Chris's father and he'll probably scream at you.

Is pure sense and logic what we want, though?

Gah. Maybe I'm just jaded. I do wish there were buttons you could press that would shut down all the emotional centers in your brain, say, when you need to concentrate. Having no emotions gives me more control of myself and focuses my energies.

Then again.... would I be "I" after the emotions are gone? Is control of one's own life really that important?

Would I turn emotions back on if I turned them off to begin with?

Okay. I'm blabbering. To close, I think Haddon has an unbelievably good grasp of Asperger's syndrome... at least in terms of my own observations of others who self-identified as having it. It's left me with an array of unfortunately random and unsettling thoughts (and yes, Roger would say I'm jumping topics, being unclear, and worst: making no sense).

*-EDIT-*
And that reminds me of the hedgehog's dilemma yet again. Schopenhauer I think at least caught on to a little truth about human relationships.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Anna Karenina

In what seems to be a huge splurge in blogging, I can't help but write a little about Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, even though I've yet to plow through the rest of this gargantuan work.

I can't help sharing my admiration for his almost fearsome understanding of human psychology. I can't speak for his understanding of the female psyche, but I see fragmented reflections of myself when I read about Levin and Aleksey Aleksandrovich that leave tingles on my spine. Levin especially delights me as a character, frustrated with his own shyness and social awkwardness but noble, resilient, and tender.

I hope my words don't hold any more portent than simply highlighting minor similarities in characteristics, given that at this moment, Aleksey's wife Anna is in an adulterous relationship and he drowns himself in work to avoid dealing with it... and Levin renounces marriage. Hm. I suppose I could be a happy bachelor, but even Vronsky is really what started the mess... and is a romantic mess himself.

Psh. Good night, world.

Testimonies

After singing in an a cappella group called Testimony, I am stunned by the weakness of my own testimony and disappointed in my insecurities to share it.

Earlier this week at Tahoe, I indirectly asked if anyone was willing to share a little about their testimony. Like Levin in Anna Karenina, who in the rush of his convictions temporarily forgets about the social conventions, I suddenly realized how inappropriate the question was. My friends seemed to shift uncomfortably, and out of politeness, allowed me to continue before jumping in with random conversation-shifting quips to fill the awkward silence that followed. Allie mumbled some random words and Adam nodded and said thank you. It was like we all lost our footing and were stumbling about for something to bring us back to our comfort zone.

Except, in a room of Christian friends that I felt I could trust (Ha. Maybe not), I was also deeply disappointed. Most of my disappointment arose from realizing that I was hypocritical for bringing up a topic (it was really just a random thought) that I myself would never have not answered had it been posed to me. Part of my disappointment arose from knowing that I would feel ashamed. Ashamed of the self-same gospel that I, in my private hours and devotions, proclaim as true.

I hadn't imagined that sharing a testimony would be a large social taboo. A testimony, which in many ways is what makes us the "salt and light of the earth," is a dangerous thing. It calls for change, and it places the one who shares it responsibility for his or her words. In a funny ironic twist, a testimony can be shared to a large audience when polished and given a spin that fit the social framework (most conspicuously, at a Testimony show, for example), precisely because it releases the speaker from much of the personal responsibility that a testimony requires (it was only part of the show).

But over the course of my time in China, I've understood that Christianity is rarely socially acceptable, and it oughtn't be. Healthy churches are not those that blend in, but those that make you feel convicted to get off your bum. Whether or not we believe he is the savior of mankind aside, Christ doesn't follow convention. He really pisses off the leaders of the time by being a rebel, breaking the Sabbath, consorting with prostitutes, and working with lepers. I can't be a Christian by fitting in with the crowd.

How ironic that my convictions for social change can be articulated freely at Stanford, but my personal convictions as a servant of Christ are shrouded in a mist of social appropriateness, because Christ's proclamation that he is the way, the truth, the life seems inappropriate at a place like Stanford.

At the sermon at Grace Presbyterian this morning, I began to see that the story of Christ has been watered down to a meaningless goop. For me to nod off during a sermon on Christ's sacrifice for humanity strikes me as hypocritical. Ultimately, it's a matter of responsibility of my words. I think God would be more pleased if I simply renounced him and said Jesus Christ was boring (perhaps like Peter) rather than expressing my love and passion but betraying it with my actions (perhaps like Judas). Here is why I fear sharing my testimony: it forces me to take responsibility. I cannot bear being identified as a hypocrite even though I already am one.

I'm not usually comfortable posting such things on a publicly accessible blog, but the irony is that I shouldn't be.

So I take responsibility for my words: I am a weak hypocrite seeking change; a man--a boy, rather--searching for the strength to proclaim my convictions; a Peter that seeks to be reinstated, heartbroken and confused in equal measure.

**--EDIT--**
On the other hand (and yet another twist), as an a cappella group, Testimony has also struggled with "running with runners" and being tentmakers as per Paul. In some ways, there is a tension between proclaiming a testimony and making sure that it's done in a way that does not alienate others. Indeed, the group needs to aspire to musical excellence such that others are even willing to listen in the first place before any deeper message can be sent. I'm personally not a fan of signholders that tell others they are going to Hell for their sin (they're sharing a testimony... but probably not a shared one with me and definitely not in a proper way).

To be more circumspect about what I've written, I think the method by which a testimony is offered matters significantly (back to how form fits function, and how must fit what). Returning to the dinner conversation up at Tahoe, if I had known (as I was duly informed) that some at the table had former issues or reservations with people giving testimonies in such a fashion, I think a consciousness of social norms would be crucial.

My point isn't necessarily that I ought to ignore all social norms, only that Jesus' call and my convictions (if I truly believe them!) ought not be prioritized under them. Surely, part of my conviction is to love others, and that requires some sensitivity to those norms to ensure some degree of communication and comfort.

My apologies for rash thinking and writing.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Golden - Backpost

A boulder of granite with a golden furrow of sandstone rests across from the tree, whose roots stretch like a wrinkled carpet across the musky soil. A sky of azure hangs like a shroud.

Conflict is inherent for humanity as we attempt to draw together. Even the son from a mother’s womb, truly her flesh and blood, will rebel. Transience denies the very grounding that promises are made upon, such that lovers are autumn leaves that express a flurry of extravagance before withering. Why is it that we spread ourselves as far as possible when sitting in a subway train? Our privacy is sacrosanct, and yet we wallow in our loneliness, only to injure each other when we draw near. What a bag of contradictions, seeking meaning in achievement only to find them meaningless the moment they are achieved; abundantly enjoying that which is not in abundance.

A zephyr tingles the whispery air roots of the banyan tree, its leaves swaying in beat to a saturated sadness, suffocating.

Every civilization that has been, has ended, giving way to what we see today. For a little part of history we imagined an inevitable movement toward a historical endpoint, even a utopia blessed by the hand of technology. But lofty ideals usually topple toward the ground when they fly too high.

A raindrop, minute and mysterious, plops onto the sandstone furrow, a dark stain that for a moment seems to fuse with the color of the granite. Perhaps it is a bridge; or a tear in the rocky fabric.

The control that we so desire in our lives is an illusion, evidenced by our fragile minds and bodies that crumble to the fist of age and diseases. Granted, the control we do have has extended our lives and made us objectively healthier and safer. Nevertheless, our travels from birth to death are hardly free choices, and we take comfort in that fact. While we pursue control in our lives, we actually embrace the control of others. For, without control and limitations, we are doomed to be free.

Suddenly, the scuffle of sand punctures the silence. A gnarled tree branch creaks ominously.

Such philosophy wallows in its own depth, seeking to be consoled by meaning making.

A sigh and the... end. What now?

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Half-Abashed By Interest in Anime

I've recently watched several anime movies and series, after having put away this interest for several years. Shortly after watching 風の谷, my mother borrowed もののけ姫 from her school video library. I've already done my rave review on both of these, so I'll avoid talking about them. I made a foray into Grave of the Fireflies, which cost me a bout of mini-depression and introspection... then I did the unthinkable:


I took a dive into the notorious "Neon Genesis Evangelion." Needless to say, this series was written after its director had walked out of clinical depression, and aside from the portions clearly marketed to pubescent teens, this is one of the most baffling and (if you can bear with it) intellectually rich series that I've found so far. The imagery is seriously disturbing, and at least in the anime subculture, its unresolved ending has had people bickering for ages. Its experimental nature makes it difficult to understand, but it remains a landmark work in the medium of anime.

Disclaimer: I'm about the trillionth person to write about this anime.

Here's the one sentence summary: a bunch of fourteen year old kids have to pilot mechas built by a secret society and save the world from a bunch of monsters invading earth. With a summary like that, I admit part of its intellectual richness is self-deception. The Judeo-Christian imagery is ridiculous in my opinion, because it goes nowhere. It's parallel to how American media sometimes use eastern philosophy in movies, but portrays it completely out of whack and then fails to integrate it meaningfully.

The redeeming feature of the anime occurs at the latter half, when it uncharacteristically collapses inward into the psyche of the three fourteen year old pilots and their adult guardians, dissecting their motivations for piloting. Here is a priceless moment where they come to life, recognizing the sheer ludicrousness of being mecha pilots who are needed to save the world. Most importantly, it makes unbelievably good use of anime as a medium.

Like Miyazaki, I believe the artists understood anime's advantage over movies as being a flexible medium. The images can be aptly "imagined," rather than constructed. Evocative, disturbing, and thought-provoking all at the same time, this series makes images that gets at essences. The essence of feeling abandoned by parents is captured by closed doors, dolls with decapitated heads... The essence of Rei's identity crisis is captured by the fact that she's a clone: with thousands of naked replicas floating in a chamber bathed in golden light. Freudian psychoanalysis is also rampant. The characters Rei, Asuka, and Shinji represent (I think) the Id, the Ego, and Superego.

Of the whole series, I recommend seeing the last two episodes. Mind you: it's disturbing and, without context of the rest of the episode, utterly unapproachable. Well, even WITH context of the rest of the episode, it's a depiction of clinical depression...

I raise these two as the epitome of what Evangelion set out to do: experiment. This was drawn on a short budget, but for once in anime history, a small budget helped to cut out some of the crap (if making the ending doubly confusing!). Reminiscent of La Jetee, it's a series of sketched pieces interspersed with bits of interrogation directed at the characters. It doesn't aim to provide a coherent picture, preferring to baffle you with bits and pieces: but this is precisely how one feels when you ask yourself questions of existence.

My absolute favorite part is when the anime becomes, well, meta-anime. With a sketched image of Shinji floating on a piece of white paper, he questions himself: "who am I? isn't this image just what I project to others?" In proper existentialism, uneasiness sets in. Without limitations, he is just floating in space: he is meaningless. Without a horizon, a context, a mecha, other people, needs, wants, desires: he might as well disappear. A line appears on the sketchpad, and Shinji suddenly figures up from down.

Another delightful piece is when Shinji discusses his own identity onstage. There's the clear allusion to "all life is a stage." Implicit question: "as a human being, everyone has a different image of you in their minds, aren't you just acting onstage?" Moreover: isn't this why you have meaning in your life?

I am left disturbed by the themes of this anime: barriers, the hedgehog's dilemma, meaninglessness... The ending seems to be uplifting, but then you turn in on yourself as well, and your crystal clarity begins to crack as well. Of all the themes, I was delighted how they semi-redeemed the parts marketed to pubescence by suggesting the conflict inherent in our sexuality: we seek to be completely united with those who are so utterly different from us (and fine... also because much of this was Freudian, and we know what he thought about sexuality).

I stop here because there's so much to analyze. But, as I wrote in the title: I'm only half-abashed by my interest in anime. Aside from (actually still a good many) pieces clearly used as marketing to earn cash, I think portions of this series is mature, philosophically rich, and artistically avant garde. The last two episodes are gems: not seen for pleasure but rather like watching La Jetee.

On second thought, maybe a little bit like Watchmen as well.

I recall grabbing a whole bunch of series from none other than James Liu (where are you, anyway?) when I was still in high school. Hilariously, it is the single most important reason that I've continued working very hard to consolidate my Japanese abilities. But little would I have known that I would be writing this about *anime* today.

Ludicrous. But isn't the whole world like that sometimes?

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

To the Lighthouse

As I finish reading Don Quixote, I wonder if my college idealism has gotten the better of me. Assuming that my own experiences are somehow new under the sun is a fallacy.

*-*-*

After we climb the stairs to pay a brief visit to Chiang Kai Shek’s memorial, my grandfather leads me through an exhibit in the Memorial Hall, situated in the center of Taipei. Grandpa stops by a large glass case, pointing out memorabilia that he also wore when a child. When he was in school, he was a generation that participated in the New Life Movement, an effort to encourage students to be thrifty, diligent, and clean. The movement, which had fascist undertones, was a clear reaction to communism in China. When he thinks back to this time, a brief, pained expression crosses his face, a mere ripple in a calm lake.

My grandfather was basically embroiled in war for the entirety of his life since he was three years old.

In 1921, my grandfather was born in Shanghai during the heyday of the Chinese Nationalist government, incidentally, also the year the Chinese Communist Party was formed. At the age of three, the government began an all out war (Northern Expedition) to unite the country by striking down warlords, starting military schools, and raising funds from abroad. With better equipped and trained armies, Chiang Kai Shek successfully consolidated the Kuomingtang’s power, something the founding father, Dr. Sun, couldn’t achieve. Success, in its usual fleeting form, vanished as World War II ravaged China after the Lu Gou Bridge incident.

My grandfather’s school was bombed when the Japanese invaded Shanghai, burning down parts of the city, and striking inland toward Nanjing. The family village was also razed. For some time, he moved into “loaned lands, or 租界区. Those affiliated with the Allies were either placed in detention or simply disappeared. With unusual resourcefulness for the age of 21, he eventually enrolled and graduated from a university program administered by the puppet government instituted by the Japanese. From a kindhearted lady, he learned basic Japanese language and customs to survive. Ironically, after the war, he never dared to declare his college degree, knowing that it would mean time in jail with the zealous right-wing Nationalists. Today, his ability to learn new languages is still frightening: almost in his nineties, he asks me how to say fresh in English one evening. The next morning, he pauses in front of a plate of fruit, and in perfect pronunciation declares it to be “fresh fruit.”

Political wars were not the only wars that were fought in his life. Bemoaning the fact that his own father married three women, my grandfather reckoned with having three factions in the same family. Each wife vied for power through subterfuge and webs of resistance and open attack, much like political parties would flicker amongst different alliances. Such wars continued to be fought even when he returned for the first time to his hometown decades later. The Communists had targeted his family for having reared a member of the Nationalists, and made short work of his other family members by deporting them to labor camps. The remaining family members were none to happy about the “escape” of my grandfather to Taiwan.

We walk toward the Taipei train station, a bustling hub of humanity, before turning a corner to visit a tiny ryokan renowned for housing Dr. Sun. In the sweltering Taiwan summer heat, we circle through the garden when suddenly my grandfather pauses. From the corner of my eye, I see as his features relax and the tip of his mouth slide into a gentle grin. There is a moment of silence as he soaks in the beauty and subtle fragrance of flowers, as if trying to pause at a fleeting frame of tranquility amidst a long, hectic movie. I’m tempted to ask him about his impression of Dr. Sun but catch myself.

He’s gone a long way for this quiet pause.

*-*-*


During my cross-Taiwan biking trip, I stop by Elanbi (鵝鑾鼻) lighthouse in the southernmost tip of Taiwan, now painted immaculate white. The lighthouse was designed and built by the British after an American vessel sunk off the coast of Taiwan. If you look closely at the architecture, you notice small holes in the surrounding walls and in the cylindrical steel sheet on the lighthouse itself. These were used by the lighthouse staff to defend against aboriginal raids. Oh, did I mention that this was where my grandfather first met my grandmother?

In 1949, Grandpa explains, the KMT troops heading over to Taiwan were hardly the best trained. The elite had gone north to fight Russians and Chinese communists from taking over Heilongjiang: a large portion of mineral resources is located in the Northeast of China. After World War II, Grandpa moved to Taiwan for a job as a customs officer, beginning a new chapter in his life. Around 1945, his mother warned him to take his whole family with him, in spite of having to live at a lighthouse. He never saw her again, only receiving a letter proclaiming her death. Death would visit another loved one: the sweetheart of his youth and first wife passed away from an illness. Almost all of the family savings were used to try to cure her illness, leaving my grandfather to raise my eldest uncle and two aunts alone.

As a customs lighthouse officer, he was rotated among different lighthouses. He eventually landed at Elanbi lighthouse, near a town that is now known as Hengchun, or “Eternal Spring.” My grandmother at the time was a young Taiwanese woman who had grown up on the island under Japanese colonial rule, knowing very little about the situation on the mainland. She likes to say that the Japanese came to Taiwan with boots and perfect uniforms, while the KMT soldiers came in tatters and looking more like farmers. In some cases, marriages with an outsider shamed families, accustomed to marrying off daughters to nationalists only when they were extremely poor. The details of how they met are unknown to me, but I listen as my grandparents relate the first years of their married life at the lighthouse.

First, the lighthouse served as the locus of central government authority in the area, so living conditions were comparatively good. While three or four lighthouse staff used to reside at the base of the lighthouse (a 6x6 meter space), my grandfather helped build a new structure that could house his whole family. Supplies were delivered by a boat traveling around the island to each of the lighthouses. Schooling was provided for the children in the family, and high profile visits, like the visit of the youngest of the Soong sisters Soong Mei-Ling, meant luxuries like a toilet were installed.

They had to keep the lighthouse impeccably clean, wiping down the steel plating on the lighthouse, clearing out the gunk in the gas lamp, sweeping the grounds, and repainting the walls. When the family decided to raise chickens, my grandfather joined with a few other lighthouse staff to punch a hole in the back wall. Because manure was obviously not allowed on lighthouse grounds, they built a small doorway to a pen. They were even called to rebuild the walls surrounding the actual lighthouse structure.

When my grandfather moved with his entire family to Penghu, a chain of islands off the coast of Taiwan, their two sources of sustenance were canned food and seafood. Here were stories of going out to sea in the middle of the night to catch squid, which could be cooked over coals or used for bait. Simply drop a net into the dark waters and burn a piece of magnesium, which bathes the ocean with incandescent white light. The squid swarm toward the light and, voila, pull up the net. Deep sea fish were also commonly eaten, where weary fishermen would land near the lighthouse to repair their nets or find medicines, trading a fish or two in return. Sometimes, they would even share a meal and share supplies… a can of beans for a whole, fresh fish boiled in a pot of water.

The same evening I’m listening to my grandparents talk about squid, we’re eating it. For some reason, it looks a lot more appealing than before.

*-*-*

Reading the newspaper with his glasses sliding lazily down his nose, my grandfather settles into the chair across from me. One thing that he’s taught me is how to appreciate a good meal, cooked slowly and thoughtfully.

During the Chinese New Year’s meal, he gingerly takes a sip from his wineglass, filled with golden whiskey. He pauses and raises his chopsticks as he considers what to stockpile atop his rice bowl. Then his hand dives gracefully through a web of chopsticks hovering over the food. While the other family members are almost finished with their meal, allegretto, he approaches his meal slowly, lento. His bowl, as a result, contains a treasure trove of selected portions.

Two nights ago, we asked my grandfather what the most meaningful thing in life is. His answer? My grandfather stops to reflect for a few moments before half-jokingly pointing at the food on the table. “Just remember to eat well and enjoy life.”

Friday, February 20, 2009

Tokyo: Day 2

Strangely, this day has turned out to be more of a learning experience than I could have imagined.

Waking up to a lazy morning, I misplaced my room key and spent ten or so minutes flipping through my things frantically. I went downstairs for a cup of coffee and realized that my booking for a room was mishandled and lo and behold, I might not be able to stay the night at the same place. Frustrated, I booked a space at a nearby hostel and went to clean up my things. With my things packed up, I go downstairs to be told that there *indeed* is a space, since there was a cancellation. I thankfully put my things into the new room assigned to me. It being 10:30, I head outside into the cloudy drizzle and grab a bento, have an early lunch, then head out to catch a train to Ueno.

After a long trek through the park, I finally discover the National Museum, a building that seems to effortlessly fuse Western and Eastern architectural styles. The exhibits are astounding, ranging from dachi (太刀) and katana (刀, but typical samurai style) all the way to kibuki and kimono. The exhibit is conveniently organized in a circular fashion, where one literally travels along a chronologically sequenced "tour" of Japanese artifacts... most of them are kokuhou or 国宝.

After coming out from the National Museum of Japan, I found myself in a fantastically lit afternoon, post-rain-shower in the morning, with glowing sakura (櫻花)and botan (牡丹)swaying with a light breeze. Underneath the sakura were several homeless residents of Tokyo, looking as relaxed as homeless residents can be. Some were reading magazines and biting into bread, others were sitting and staring into space glumly. Or lying down on the benches, when that's possible. Mind you, this is Tokyo, where nobody ever talks on trains, and slouching is almost absent!

It's funny to have the biggest lesson of my day occur coming from what I imagined was a culturally "enlightening" experience. Perhaps it has to do with the fact that every anthropologist and photographer has some degree of arrogance. It seems that there is a "pride" in being more culturally sensitive and observant, but I has made the mistake of forgetting that this pride often contradicts the sensitivity it flaunts.

With my camera, I tried to catch a photograph of the sakura but, being aware that there were homeless underneath, I surreptitiously tried to snap the photographs without being seen. Noticing the contrast of homeless to the flowers, I wanted to take a larger framed photo, and tried zooming out a bit. Hanging out a little longer, I snapped some pictures of the park in general, then walked away. I didn't notice the homeless man following behind me, suddenly breaking into a flurry of Japanese in an uncharacteristically loud voice. Not being able to listen to Japanese at such a fast rate, I started at him blankly.

My skin color here is a clear disadvantage. He instantly burst into another spurt of harsh words, to my embarrassment and continued cluelessness. By the time I managed to explain that I was gaigakujin and couldn't understand, "wagarimasen!" he had really just chewed me off in the middle of the park. He ended up using sign language to (I think) explain that he was watching me take a photograph of him. I pointed at myself, then made a camera movement, then pointed to him, then shook my head vehemently and said "いいえ!” Clearly he wasn't in a trustworthy mood, and continued to fume at me while he stomped back to his bench. I walked away as quickly as a could, not wanting to see what other people were saying or seeing. Quite harrowing.

I spent the rest of this gorgeous afternoon walking through the park with half a mind, trying to forget this experience. In a shrine in the middle of the park, I was tempted to snap a few photos... then, struck with the thought that a monk might come out and bash my head in, I decided to stand and observe instead. More homeless stood at the side of the shrine feeding a whole bunch of birds ranging from gulls to pigeons to ducks.

Sitting here were several men in their old age, chuckling and talking to the birds as they threw them crumbs. The ojisan complained to each other about the ridiculous raucousness of the birds as they vied with each other for the crumbs. Clearly relishing in their control and the acrobatics of the birds as they fluttered crazily around pushing each other to get the food. The scene was idyllic in its beauty and simplicity, but it seemed to me a reflection of homelessness. Most of the homeless are still looking for ways to hang onto their sense of control, whether in rightfully exercising rights to accost those they want to complain to (as in this case) or in feeding the stray cats (yes, lots of feeding of cats in the park) and birds. Or perhaps, as one reads in the news, taking shoes off before entering their makeshift houses or trying to hide the fact that they really have no work to go to for the day (for the most park, homeless and unemployed are synonymous in Japan if you are male).

Speaking of gender, I am surprised that there are so few female homeless in visible sight. While I am sure there are many, I wonder if the Japanese sensibilities dictate homes be found for these women... or worse, that they push themselves to extremes to stay hidden.

When I arrived back at the hostel, I found a wonderful noodle shop that really turned my day around. Japanese noodles are really something else. They aren't too salty or spicy, but have just the right balance of flavor, subtlety, texture, and firmness to make the experience glorious in and of itself.

On a final note, I am shocked at how quickly time passes... and just starting to get used to walking down Japanese streets on the left side... and understanding how to blend right in. We'll see how things go, huh?

Friday, January 30, 2009

Tainan

來到台南有時候彷彿回到了家。



Every Chinese New Year, I will head to the south of Taiwan with my mother (sometimes the whole family, but not always). We'll meet her family, with all of my cousins and uncles (my mother only has brothers). After being in the states for two New Years in a row, I finally return to this strange yet familiar place.

Stepping off the high speed rail, the first thing I notice is the balmy weather, with a light breeze and perfect humidity. Although I've been to both Taipei and Tainan (their names mean North Taiwan and South Taiwan, respectively) during the New Year season, the mood of the south parallels their weather. A middle aged woman tows a suitcase the cackles on the tiles of the station as her other hand sways gently, gingerly grasping a delicate, wrinkled hand. The 老阿媽 ("grandmother")trods along next to her, smiling to the other passengers.

For the homegrown Taiwan folk, food and drink are virtually indispensable to living. It's better if you can get it cheap, too.



For 20 NT (that's about 70 cents), you receive 700mL of homebrewed black tea still steaming from a pot mixed with ice and sugar. Wait. And your pick of 玻霸 ("boba," or you can also ask for 珍珠, which gives you a smaller kind) Yakult, aloe vera, 仙草(Fairy Grass... which is a type of gelatin, but sounds like a new form of marijuana), 愛玉 ("love jade, which is also a type of gelatin), plum preserve, or lemons. Or wait, let's go with half the sugar, hald the ice, and maybe some 蜜餞 (generally sour fruit preserved in sugar). 老闆娘 ("the boss lady") will pull out a small plastic cup to give you a sip first while wishing you a happy new year in a thick Taiwanese accent. If you grimace, she'll remake your drink. Maybe this time you want green tea, or oolong tea, or pu-er tea... maybe you're in the mood for Earl Gray, or possibly darjeeling...

As I take my drink and leave with my cousins, the lady stalls us and asks us how the family is. My cousins banter a little more until another customer comes along, eating 豆花 ("bean flower," which is a type of tofu) from a small tub and balancing 蝦捲 (fried shrimp in batter) in the other hand. Distracted, 老闆娘 turns and asks her where she got the food so she can buy some later for her kids. Most of my favorite shops are family run, with children playing in the background. This is one of them.

Tainan is advertised as a historical city. What's more intriguing is that history remains alive and kicking, still not subsumed by globalization or new generations. Instead of being homogenous and modern, the city's culture resembles dozens of layers of paint drawn haphazardly over the same canvas, sometimes mixing to colors that are one part exquisite and one part... awkward. Uncomfortably awkward.

Fashion is one wonderful example. An older generation of Tainanese still dash around in scooters, in flip flops, shorts, and undershirts. A generation of Tainanese youth wear a mysterious mixture of torn jeans, short skirts, bling, T-shirts with incorrectly spelled English, huge earrings, skating shoes, and/or caps. But they're scooching around in flip flops. Then there's the new professional look, with long, tight sweaters that might double as dresses if there were a need; collared shirts tucked under an array of jackets, sweaters, and coats; nicer shoes... but they're hairstyle looks like it came out of manga. Purple T-shirts with green pants, hanging down to show white boxers... oops! Briefs. Brand names are having a shouting match on the street: Adidas, Nike, New Balance, and "Rebok." Lacoste, Hugo Boss, and "Tefany." Nissan, Mazda, Volkswagen, as well as obscure ones like "Zace."

What's intriguing is that all of this occurs together in Tainan's city center, without the sifting and sorting that usually happens. Tourists are clearly a little baffled.

Part of the reason for Tainan's heterogeneity is its colonial history. Dutch architecture can be found in some portions of the city, a legacy from its identity as a trading post. I visit an old street with my mother, decorated as if it were lifted out of Japan. Well, it wouldn't be surprising, given the fifty years that Taiwan spent under Japanese rule. Almost every native born Taiwanese over the age of sixty can speak Japanese. But Japan's cultural influence has struck Tainan's youth as well.



"哈日" refers to the cultural consumption of all things Japanese. I think it swings from an understandable interest in the things of manga, anime, and those fantastically popular things of this age.

Things of note:
-hot springs ("mud spring") and complicated family matters
-surrouding a pot of kimchi and lots of food...
-having allie announced to a whole dinner table
-majong!
-the open gate before the toll gate
-flowers, mushrooms (jianghua), and strolling the park
-5021
-林阿伯
-the working class, touring the new factories, stories of facotry closing
-my wild cousin
-my oldest uncle's family and their quirkiness
-even if Taiwan were to become subsumed politically into Chinese territory, I wonder if this subculture will ever follow suit.

EDIT (20 Feb 2009)
Now that I'm actually *in* Japan, I am reminded of a paper I read on Taiwan's dissociative identity as well as its touchy political identity. Maybe more on this later. It's interesting to see which parts of Taiwan have been borrowed (there are enough Taiwanese restaurants to be shocking here... not what I expected), and which parts Taiwan has borrowed from Japan in turn.